<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Wired Gin&#187; Aviation Gin</title>
	<atom:link href="http://wiredgin.com/tag/aviation-gin/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://wiredgin.com</link>
	<description>Facts, News and Opinions about Gin</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 May 2012 13:30:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Review: Aviation Gin</title>
		<link>http://wiredgin.com/reviews/review-aviation-gin/</link>
		<comments>http://wiredgin.com/reviews/review-aviation-gin/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Sep 2010 19:17:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>paul</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Aviation Gin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[review]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wiredgin.com/?p=92</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This gin review is quite challenging to write, because the first question that comes to mind is: Is Aviation Gin really gin? Aviation describes itself as a &#8220;botanical democracy&#8221;. Alas, democracy is for governments, but juniper is for gin. Aviation lacks that anchor. Some juniper can be found, but it is well-buried. Don&#8217;t get me [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://wiredgin.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/wired_aviation_gin.jpg"><img class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-94" title="Aviation Gin" src="http://wiredgin.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/wired_aviation_gin.jpg" alt="gin review"width="150" height="294" /></a></p>
<p>This <b>gin review</b> is quite challenging to write, because the first question that comes to mind is: Is <a title="Aviation Gin" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.aviationgin.com/" target="_self">Aviation Gin</a> really gin?</p>
<p>Aviation describes itself as a &#8220;botanical democracy&#8221;. Alas, democracy is for governments, but juniper is for gin. Aviation lacks that anchor. Some juniper can be found, but it is well-buried.</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t get me wrong, this concoction is quite tasty. It just doesn&#8217;t taste like <em>gin</em>. Distilled from rye, it carries a rich flavor and an excellent, somewhat oily mouth feel. The sweet flavor derives from the use of botanicals like sarsaparilla and orange peel, and lavender brings a flowery aroma. I agree with <a title="Randy's Review of Aviation Gin" rel="nofollow" href="http://boozepages.com/2008/12/aviation-gin-randys-review/" target="_self">Randy&#8217;s assessment</a> that &#8220;&#8230;the distillers may be trying to shatter some preconceived notions of what gin should be.&#8221;  That said, enjoy it straight but don&#8217;t expect it to satisfy in traditional London Dry Gin cocktails unless you don&#8217;t really like the taste of juniper.</p>
<p>To make matters confusing, &#8220;Aviation&#8221; is also the name of a fabulous gin cocktail as well as the name of this gin. Check out the recipe in our <a title="Top Five Summer Gin Drinks" href="http://wiredgin.com/recipes/top-gin-drinks-for-summertime/">Top Five Summer Gin Drinks</a> article. With this name clash, I feel compelled to finish this <i>gin review</i> with a review of an Aviation gin cocktail made with Aviation Gin.  The resulting cocktail is sweet and bright, but lacks substance. The bright flavor is a good fit for summertime, but my personal preference would be for a gin that stands out better against the lemon and cherry burst in an Aviation cocktail, like Tanqueray or Junipero.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://wiredgin.com/reviews/review-aviation-gin/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

